header image
Home arrow Current Issues arrow Relevent Issues arrow Maybank Five Points Rezoning Revisited
Maybank Five Points Rezoning Revisited
Written by BY JENNY PETERSON, The Journal   
A proposal to rezone land at Maybank Highway and Wood­land Shores Road for neighbor­hood shops remains alive on James Island.
Town Council initially voted 4 to ­1 against rezoning the land from residential use to planned unit de­velopment for the neighborhood shops on Feb. 5.
Councilman Joe Qualey voted in favor of the rezoning.
A month later at its March 11 meeting, council took back its “no” vote so a public hearing could be held. That hearing will be 7 p.m. April 15 at Town Hall, 1238 Camp Road on James Island.
Before the revote, James Island Mayor Mary Clark said council did not follow proper procedures or guidelines on the initial rezon­ing vote.
Council members did not dis­cuss residents’ opinions about the development in a public forum,
did not allow Town Administra­tor Roy DeHaven to make a rec­ommendation and did not review the town’s land‑use plan when considering the rezoning request, she said.
“This is the single most talked­about subject in the town,” Clark added.
At council’s March 18 meeting, council members defended their decision to one resident who lives near Woodland Shores Road and opposes the rezoning.
Joanne Dixon berated council members Leonard Blank and Bill “Cubby” Wilder for voting to re­consider their initial vote against the rezoning. Blank made the motion to reconsider and Wilder seconded it.
“Blank and Wilder said they would support the people,” Dixon said.
She said there was a petition from residents against the rezon­ing. “Ninety people deserve a re­sponse from each of you,” she said. “I want to know if I should waste my time (opposing it).”
Blank said he had not seen the petition before voting, which was one of the reasons he rescinded his vote, to hold a public hearing on the matter.
Black said voting to reconsider the project doesn’t mean he ulti­mately will vote in favor of it.
“I don’t support it, and I don’t intend to support it,” he said.
Wilder said he also voted in the spirit of a public hearing and said he wanted to place the neighbor­hood into a historical overlay district, prohibiting more com­mercial ventures.
Dixon told council they should take into consideration where residents live during the public hearing.
Many residents on Woodland Shores Road, who would be di­rectly affected by the develop­ment, oppose the rezoning. Oth­er residents in nearby Riverland Terrace are more in favor of the rezoning, she said.
Clark said she always takes residents who are directly affected by development into consideration.
“I have not voted for it and prob­ably will not,” she said.